top of page


Haim (Efim) Yakovlevich Barsuk was born in 1902 in the Ukrainian city of Proskurov (now Khmelnytskyi), into the family of Yakov and Frada Barsuk. Yakov Haimovich Barsuk (born around 1870) worked as a weigher for local merchants. Haim was the second son in the family; he had three brothers: the eldest, Lazar, and two younger ones, Meir and Israel. Haim grew up a capable young man and enrolled in the local commercial school.

The atmosphere in the city encouraged entrepreneurship: before the outbreak of the First World War, Proskurov developed rapidly and became the largest trade center of the Podolia Governorate, largely due to the railway that passed through the city. The city played a particularly important role in grain exports. Proskurov’s commercial and credit institutions served a large region. About half of the population was Jewish.

The hardships of the Revolution and the Civil War drastically changed the fate of millions. In those turbulent years on the territory of the collapsed empire, antisemitism intensified. In 1919–1920, several waves of Jewish pogroms swept through Proskurov. The first of them, in January 1919, was caused by a false accusation that the so-called “apartment guard” (a Jewish self-defense body) had supported a Bolshevik uprising. The pogrom claimed 1,650 lives, and another 600 people were wounded. In February 1922, the Jewish Public Relief Committee (“Evobshchestkom”) prepared a report on the victims of the Jewish pogroms of 1919–1920, which, as its compilers acknowledged, was far from complete. According to the report, over those two years 1,425 Jewish families in Proskurov suffered from the pogroms to one degree or another, and the total material damage amounted to 8.7 million rubles.

Yakov Barsuk’s family survived the violence; however, during the pogrom of November 18, 1920, it sustained damage amounting to one thousand rubles. It is difficult to say exactly when Haim Barsuk became interested in Zionist ideas (possibly even during the tsarist period), but the Jewish pogroms of 1919–1920 undoubtedly contributed to their consolidation.

In the first years of Soviet rule, life in Proskurov seemed to be improving. Thanks to the New Economic Policy (NEP) and the economic activity of the Jewish population, the city’s economy gradually recovered. However, this growth did not last long: with the curtailment of the NEP, a significant number of artisans and merchants were placed in the disenfranchised category of “lishentsy” (persons deprived of civil rights).

In the political sphere, the Bolsheviks from the outset aimed to establish a one-party dictatorship; any other organizations were perceived as a threat, including Zionist ones. Participants in the Zionist movement were subjected to repression almost from the first months of Soviet rule. By 1923, only two Zionist organizations remained in the USSR that were permitted by the authorities: the Jewish Communist Workers’ Party “Poalei Zion” and the legal wing of the youth movement “HeHalutz,” whose supporters considered it possible for the Zionist movement to coexist with the Soviet regime.

The legal wing of “HeHalutz” operated in Proskurov and took part in establishing several enterprises, for example, a tobacco growers’ cooperative. Only a few years remained before the final prohibition of “HeHalutz.”

Some of the Zionists of Proskurov went underground. Among them was our hero. It was Haim Barsuk who headed the secret wing of the local “HeHalutz.” At that time, the young man worked as secretary of the domkombed—the house committee of the poor (a body of residential self-government). Haim Barsuk’s close associate was Iekhezkel Shaikin, an employee of the Proskurov procurement office. Both were later described by Chekist officials as “coming from a petty-bourgeois background.”

Documents of the GPU contain information about a certain “liquidation” operation against the “grouping” of Barsuk and Shaikin, carried out in December 1922. However, the Proskurov cell of “HeHalutz” at that time only temporarily suspended its activities, and by the summer of 1923 it resumed them.

Barsuk and Shaikin’s group consisted of seventeen members. It maintained contact with the Lviv organization of “HeHalutz” (which was located in Polish territory), receiving necessary information from it. The group collected funds for its activities through membership dues.

Meetings were held once or twice a month, at which reports were read on Jewish literature, the Zionist movement, and emigration to Palestine. Meetings of the leaders were held separately: for reasons of secrecy, they took place in boats on the Bug River, away from the city. The group did not recruit new members, as Barsuk and Shaikin feared Chekist agents.

Despite the efforts of Barsuk and Shaikin to observe secrecy, the Chekists nevertheless managed to infiltrate the group with an informant. However, no arrests or searches followed: the Chekists lacked sufficient information and evidence. It is possible that the investigators were waiting, hoping in time to reach “larger birds,” for example the leaders of the Lviv organization, through the heads of the Proskurov “HeHalutz.” It would also have been a clear success to catch someone in the act while attempting an illegal border crossing, but the Proskurov Zionists did not carry out such actions.

In 1923, however, Haim Barsuk was arrested. The Chekists still lacked evidence: no charges were brought, and Haim was soon released.

The following fifteen years of Haim Barsuk’s life are not reflected in documentary records, but they can be partially reconstructed from later sources. The leader of the secret wing of “HeHalutz” married Fania Marder. In 1928, their daughter Olya was born, and eight years later, Ira. Haim worked as a teacher at the Proskurov vocational school of the “Obllessoyuz.”

Meanwhile, the Bolsheviks’ anti-Zionist policy was becoming more severe. In late 1925 and early 1926, mass arrests of Zionists took place in connection with the authorities’ implementation of the Birobidzhan project—the creation of a fully controlled Jewish “autonomy” in the southern part of the Far Eastern Territory. In 1928, the last legal non-Bolshevik party in the USSR (not only Jewish, but any) — “Poalei Zion” — was dissolved. Shortly before that, “HeHalutz” had also been finally banned.

As history showed, this was only the beginning. By the 1930s, the Zionist movement in the USSR had been almost completely destroyed. However, many Zionists still remained at liberty, and “underground Zionist counterrevolutionary organizations” were now used by the Chekists to fabricate cases involving connections with foreign intelligence services, espionage, treason, and so on. The Great Terror of 1937–1938, the peak of Stalinist repressions, was unfolding. Our hero was caught in it.

On June 26, 1938, Haim Barsuk was arrested by the Proskurov city department of the NKVD. The Chekists also detained Iekhezkel Gorenstein, who worked as a planner at the Proskurov bread factory. The basis for the arrest of both men was the testimony of Iekhezkel Shaikin, already mentioned above; apparently, he did not withstand the pressure of the investigation.

According to Shaikin’s testimony, a cell operated in the city that was a branch of the all-Ukrainian center of “HeHalutz.” H. Barsuk was an emissary of its committee and was responsible for agitation; I. Gorenstein carried out operational work; and I. Shaikin was in charge of financial matters.

Between 1920 and 1924, the main goal of the organization was direct emigration to Palestine. Many members succeeded: Bleichman (it was he who in 1920 persuaded Shaikin to join the group) and his two brothers, Shpilberg, Weisman and his two sisters, Iekhezkel Gorenstein (who later returned to Proskurov), and the Schwartz family moved to Eretz Israel. Bleichman, Shpilberg, and Weisman formed the first committee of the group; after their departure, they were replaced by H. Barsuk, I. Gorenstein, and I. Shaikin.

From 1925, when exit visas from the USSR ceased to be issued, the group concentrated on agitation and the promotion of Zionist ideas. Funds for organizational expenses and assistance to those who had left for Palestine were raised through the cultivation of land plots and the sale of the harvest to members of the organization at low prices.


In 1936, a representative of the Vinnytsia regional organization of “HeHalutz,” Dukhovny, arrived in Proskurov. He gathered former active participants of the Zionist movement and called on them to cooperate more closely with one another. A kind of united committee was formed, consisting of Haim Barsuk (“HeHalutz”), Vitenberg (leader of the local “Hashomer”), and Vertzman, an accountant of the Proskurov district (Jewish People’s Party).

The key tasks of the local Zionist movement were allegedly the struggle against the Soviet system and espionage in favor of England. Apparently, as an illustration of this claim, I. Shaikin testified that the Proskurov group collected various types of information: economic information—shortage goods and their prices, indicators of the performance of local collective farms (provided by I. Shaikin himself); and topographical information—data on the location of bridges and highways (provided by I. Gorenstein).

Shaikin’s testimony allowed the investigators to charge Haim Barsuk under the “counterrevolutionary” Articles 54-10 and 54-11 of the Criminal Code of the Ukrainian SSR. Not only his life was at risk, but also the future of his wife and two young daughters, as well as his associates in the Zionist movement.

After his arrest in Proskurov, Haim Barsuk was transferred to the prison in the city of Kamianets-Podilsk. He spent five months in detention before the first interrogation, without being informed of the charges.

The interrogation records make a strong impression. They reflect the voice of a person who, while under severe pressure, remained calm and conducted himself confidently and with dignity. When asked about his social origin, Haim answered in considerable detail: his father had been a small trader and, after the Revolution, worked as a cashier and tax collector; he died in 1933. His elder brother Lazar had previously worked in the police in Crimea and was currently employed in the economic sector. The second brother, Meir, a party member, graduated in 1937 from the Kharkiv Institute of Agricultural Mechanization and Electrification and worked in Bashkiria. The third brother, Israel (also a Communist), was a teacher in Kyiv.

Haim’s answers to the key questions of the investigation were concise:

“Question: Do you admit your guilt in that you are an active participant in an anti-Soviet Zionist organization?

Answer: I cannot confirm Shaikin’s testimony. It is an absolute lie. I did not belong to any anti-Soviet Zionist organization and was and remain a loyal son of the Soviet country.

Question: …while working as a teacher at the Proskurov school, you were a member of a Zionist organization. Tell us about this in more detail.

Answer: I categorically deny my participation in a Zionist organization both during my years of study, at the Communist University, and in recent years.”

Incredibly, Haim Barsuk’s tactic worked. The testimony of other witnesses (apart from I. Shaikin)—Isaac Sherman, Natan Berenstein, Wolf Ostatnigrosh, Aron Kleinberg, Abram Kharmats, Volt Milman, and Sima Palti—confirmed his statements. The operative officer of the Proskurov city department of the NKVD, Avdeev, having reviewed the materials, was compelled to state: “The investigative actions carried out have not obtained sufficient materials to bring Efim Yakovlevich Barsuk to trial. Barsuk categorically denies his participation in an anti-Soviet organization. Witness testimony does not confirm his involvement in any anti-Soviet activity.”

On January 15, 1939, the investigation issued a resolution to terminate the case, and on March 26, 1939, this decision was confirmed by the Prosecutors. After nine months in the Kamianets-Podilsk prison, Haim Barsuk was released.

Subsequently, twice — in 1949 and 1952 — the Chekists requested materials concerning Haim Barsuk; on the second occasion, not only regarding him but also his eldest daughter, Olga Grossman. Nothing compromising was found.

In 1998, in independent Ukraine, on the basis of the Law “On the Rehabilitation of Victims of Political Repressions,” the case was reviewed. The Directorate of the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU) for the Khmelnytskyi region issued a decision to rehabilitate Haim Barsuk. The arrest had evidently been made without sufficient grounds, based on the testimony of only one witness, and he had spent nine months in custody. Justice, though delayed, prevailed.

Courage and endurance, as well as a considerable measure of luck, helped Haim Barsuk protect his associates in the Zionist movement from imprisonment and torture, and his family from the stigma of being relatives of an enemy of the people. Haim was surely aware that his persistence was not a guarantee of salvation. In the harsh realities of those years, even testimony required by the investigation did not necessarily promise freedom. Perhaps more than once he heard an inner voice suggesting: “what if I tell them — not everything, but at least some facts…”. But he did not yield to weakness, performing an act of responsibility and love.

19.02.2026
Author: Mikhail Krivitsky
Translated by Lena Lores





Bibliography and Sources:


Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine. Case of the UKGB of the Khmelnytskyi Region No. P-2737.

Sectoral State Archive of the Security Service of Ukraine. Fond 13. File 413. Circulars and reports of the GPU of Ukraine on the struggle against Zionist organizations in 1922–1923.

State Archive of the Russian Federation. Fond R-6764. Inventory 1. File 820. Register of losses and victims suffered by the Jewish population during the pogroms of 1919–1920 carried out by anti-Soviet authorities and their military units.

Khmelnytskyi. WORLD ORT. Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia. Khmelnytskyi – Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia ORT.

Ukraine. Jews of Ukraine, 1914–1920. WORLD ORT. Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia. Ukraine. Jews of Ukraine, 1914–1920 – Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia ORT.

Ukraine. Jews of Ukraine between the Two World Wars (1920–39). WORLD ORT. Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia. Ukraine. Jews of Ukraine between the Two World Wars (1920–39) – Electronic Jewish Encyclopedia ORT.

Kostyrchenko, G. V. Stalin’s Secret Policy: Power and Antisemitism. Moscow, 2003.

“HeHalutz” in Soviet Russia (1917–1932): Collection of Documents and Materials. Compiled by M. Mitsel. Jerusalem–Kyiv, 2005.

Maor, I. The Zionist Movement in Russia. Jerusalem, 1977.

Geller, M. Ya. Machine and Screws: The History of the Formation of the Soviet Man. Moscow, 1994.

Haim (Efim) Barsuk

1902 – ?

bottom of page